RAGAS estimates faithfulness by first decomposing the answer into individual claims. Why is that decomposition step important?
- It lets each atomic claim be verified against the context separately
- It shortens the answer to fit within the judge's limited context window
- It removes stop words so scoring is cheaper
- It translates claims into a canonical language
Why
Breaking the answer into atomic claims lets the judge check support for each one, so a single unsupported sentence lowers the score even if the rest is grounded. It is not about truncation, stop-word removal, or translation — those wouldn't localize which claim is unsupported.